Upon further examination of the report, one learns that Shanghai Hualain is the SOLE provider of the abortion pill, RU-486, to the United State. (In the past, France had provided the U.S. with the pill.)
The New York Times reported that RU-486 is manufactured at a different factory than the leukemia medication, and that that factory had passed FDA inspections...yet later in the article it is revealed that employees in the factory that is now under sever scrutiny lied in the past about procedures and lack of standards in their work environment...leading one to wonder what goes on in the factory manufacturing the abortion pill. This, however, shouldn't come as a shock.
Doesn't it make sense that the most unregulated business in the United States, the abortion industry, would receive 'supplies' from poorly regulated factories and businesses abroad? Taken from the Times:
"When told of Shanghai Hualian’s troubles, Dr. Sidney M. Wolfe, a leading consumer advocate and frequent F.D.A. critic, said American regulators ought to be concerned because of accusations that serious health risks had been covered up there. “Every one of these plants should be immediately inspected,” he said."
Even the U.S. distributor of RU-486, Danco Laboratories--which does not report a street address--would not return calls from the NYTimes inquiring about standards relating to the manufacturing, handling and distribution of RU-486.
So, to recap, we now know that RU-486 in the U.S. is exclusively imported from China (which which was not public knowledge in the past).
Furthermore, there is now MORE evidence to question the 'safety' of RU-486. We know that this pill terminates the life of an unborn child...and it is proven that it can be harmful and even life threatening for women, causing pelvic infection (which has lead to death) and sever hemorrhaging, among other side effects.
Yet, what of the emotional aftermath?
The former chairman of Roussel-Uclaf (the French company which developed RU-486), Edouard Sakiz told the French newspaper Le Monde:
"As abortifacient procedures go, RU-486 is not at all easy to use. ... True, no anaesthetic is required. But a woman who wants to end her pregnancy has to 'live' with her abortion for at least a week using this technique. It's an appalling psychological ordeal."63
Catherine Euvrard, formerly a spokeswoman for Roussel-Uclaf who now holds the same job for the new French manufacturer of RU-486, Exelgyn, has said: "When [women] take a pill, they have the feeling they are truly responsible for the abortion. ... [There can be more] psychological pain."64
"During this critical two-week period [between 49 and 63 days] the tiny embryo in an amorphous sac begins to look very much like a baby, with a discernible head and limbs. ... Nurse Frenpzel remembers a day ... when she ... saw six surgical dishes with six embryos in them by the sink. 'It was upsetting,' she said. 'It was like looking at a little row of people. The women too were shocked when they looked at what they had expelled."65
"You have to be very confident to choose this method. It may be physically more natural, but psychologically it hits you much harder. You preside over the killing of a baby, completely unblinkingly. For women who are confused or vulnerable, and of course, so many are in this position, it is really terrible."66
One woman in U.S. trials was hospitalized for depression after attempting suicide.67
Clearly, it is time to Re-Think RU-486...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
63 Interview, "Drug firm defends marketing strategy on abortion pill," Guardian Weekly (U.K.), August
19, 1989, at 16.
64 F. Vrazo, "In Europe, 'Abortion Pill' Has Not Met Expectations," Philadelphia Inquirer, August 25, 1996, at A01.
65 Louise Levathes, Hippocrates, February 1995, at 45.
66 "One Woman's Experience," London Evening Standard, December 4, 1993.
67 Lisa Rarick, M.D., of the FDA's Reviewing Division, testimony before the Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee, Hearing Transcript FDA, July 19, 1996, at 134.
(Reported by RU486Facts.org)





